Statement of Claim No. T2068-18 filed in Canadian Federal Court
Official Public Record
Lack of response from the Canadian government to a Moratorium filed Nov 16.18 by the Canadian Peoples’ Union Freedom2017 Inc. [the CPU] on behalf of the Canadian people [link below], led the CPU to file a Statement of Claim in Federal Court.
The plaintiff claims: MISFEASANCE, MALFEASANCE AND NONFEASANCE IN THE USURPATION OF THE SOVEREIGN RIGHTS OF THE CANADIAN PEOPLE, THE CITIZENS OF CANADA
PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE: IN THE USURPATION OF THE SOVEREIGN RIGHTS OF THE CANADIAN PEOPLE AND THE INDIGENOUS NATIONS, THE CROWN OF CANADA’S SOVEREIGNTY, ITS RESOURCES AND ASSETS INITIATED BY THE CANADIAN FEDERAL, PROVINCIAL, MUNICIPAL AND BAND COUNCIL GOVERNMENTS OF CANADA.
Statement of Claim excerpts provided by page as follows. Statement of Claim PDF below.
Statement of Claim excerpt page 1
Whereas; The Canadian people, the citizens, derive their Sovereign lawful authority and democratic rights from:
- The Statute of Westminster 1931,
- The General Assembly’s 1960 resolution 1514 (XV) — containing the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples and the principle of self-determination through the free and genuine expression of the will of the peoples of the territory,
- The International Court of Justice advisory opinion issued the October 16, 1975- disqualifying Terra Nullius,
- The Canadian Constitution 1982.
Statement of Claim excerpt page 2
Therefore; It is obvious that all levels of Canadian governance since 1982, and the Courts of Justice:
- have not acted in the best interest of the Canadian people, the citizens, as the Sovereigns, and the Indigenous Nations,
- have committed acts of misfeasance and malfeasance and nonfeasance against the Canadian people, the citizens, as the Sovereigns, in order to act “ULTRA VIRES”,
- have continued to instill the de facto misrepresentation within the Canadian Constitution upon the Canadian people, the citizens, as the Sovereigns, leaving them with no lawful or legal recourse for protection against their own governing bodies under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Canadian Constitution of Canada and its Criminal Code.
Statement of Claim excerpt page 3
Therefore; The Canadian people, the citizens, as the Sovereigns, have been left politically uneducated, and misled notwithstanding the education materials provided by the Canadian government in teaching the Canadian children that “in Canada, the citizens make decisions together”. However, what is not taught is that the only decision the citizens can make together is to vote in political elections for a political party to form a government to govern over them as per the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, without true legitimate recourse by the Canadian people, the citizens, as the Sovereigns, to implement their rights to:
- final decision making authority,
- one hundred percent veto power,
- direct democracy rights to referendums on all issues affecting Canadians, our governance and the country.
Statement of Claim excerpt page 4
Therefore; We the Canadian people, the citizens, as the Sovereigns, were and are left with no other recourse to instill true justice in the protection of our country and our rights as the official co-owners, shareholders of the Crown within our governments, political system and justice system, since we cannot sue ourselves for our rights, and that the Canadian Ministers, Attorney General and the courts are in conflict of interest as being part of the Executive, Legislative and Judiciary branches of the Canadian Government, accused of usurpation and acting “ULTRA VIRES “, we have had to create and incorporate a not for profit corporation as “The Canadian Peoples Union, Freedom 2017 INC. as representatives of our Union and its members being the Canadian people, the citizens, as the Sovereigns, and co-owners, shareholders of the Crown of Canada, the Corporation Sole, and the Crown Corporation of Canada in order to lawfully move forward within our rights.
Statement of Claim excerpt page 5
Whereas; The Governor General is to also immediately proceed to enforce appropriate changes in the wording within the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Canadian Constitution, to reflect the Canadian people, the citizens, as the Sovereigns, and to immediately launch criminal investigations on behalf of the Canadian people, the citizens, as the Sovereigns, they represent within all levels of governance that have jeopardized the well being of all Canadians and Indigenous Nations, until the Canadian people and Indigenous Nations have given their majority consent to either accept or refute all present and future proposed laws or agreements as follows:
6. End National, Provincial and International Public Private Partnerships (P3’s or PPP),
9. Suspend all United Nations Agreements with Canada, whether binding or non binding until the Canadian people, the citizens and Indigenous Nations both as Sovereigns have given their majority consent to either accept or refute all proposed laws or agreements such as: The United Nations Global Compact in its entirety and specifically, the UN Global Compact for Migration.*
Statement of Claim excerpt page 6
Therefore; It is imperative that the Canadian people, the citizens, as the Sovereigns, and co-owners, shareholders of the Crown of Canada, its Corporation Sole along with the Indigenous Nations across Canada, take immediate lawful and peaceful action to stop the usurpation of the country, and rights from being eroded and removed by various levels of Canadian governance, in order to protect the country and its assets, finances and resources belonging to the Canadian people, the citizens, as the Sovereigns.
Usurpation of Canadian Sovereignty Court Action: The Canadian Peoples Union v Her Majesty the Queen
Statement of Claim PDF
Malfeasance, misfeasance and nonfeasance are terms that have legal implications. We will examine the difference between the words malfeasance, misfeasance and nonfeasance, where these words came from and some examples of their use in sentences.
Malfeasance is a wrongful or criminal act perpetrated by a public official or other person of authority. An act of malfeasance is done intentionally, disregarding the fact that the action is morally or legally wrong and will cause someone harm. The adjective form is malfeasant. The word malfeasance is derived from the French word malfaisance, which means wrongdoing.
Misfeasance is a an act that lawful, but performed in an unlawful, illegal or injurious manner. Generally, misfeasance is different from malfeasance in that the actor does not have the intent to harm, but the harm comes through the actor’s irresponsibility or negligence. The adjective form is misfeasant. The word misfeasance is derived from the French word mesfaisance, meaning to mis-do.
Nonfeasance is the failure to do something that one is legally responsible to do. Nonfeasance is an intentional failure to live up to one’s legal or moral duty in a given situation, a refusal to fulfill one’s obligation. The adjective form is nonfeasant. The word nonfeasance is derived from the French word faisance meaning an action, and the prefix non– which means not.
Thailand’s Deputy Prime Minister Prawit Wongsuwan has warned officials they risked facing malfeasance charges if they do not hunt down fugitive former Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra after recent photos circulating on social media apparently showed she had been in London. (The Straits Times)
Ronald Ereiser’s principal ground of appeal to the Tax Court was that his reassessments should be vacated because they were issued as the result of misfeasance in public office on the part of CRA tax investigators. (The Lawyer’s Daily)
St. Lawrence County District Attorney Gary M. Pasqua has closed an investigation by his predecessor, Mary E. Rain, into the county’s alleged acts of “misconduct, nonfeasance and neglect of any county department head and/or employee.” (The Watertown Daily Times)
Statement of Claim No. T2068-18 recorded in Canadian Federal Court https://ourgreaterdestiny.org/2018/12/press-release-canadian-government-accused-of-usurpation-of-the-sovereign-rights-of/
Press Release court claim T2068-18. https://www.einpresswire.com/article/470206897/canadian-government-accused-of-usurpation-of-the-sovereign-rights-of-canadians-indigenous-nations
Britain freed Canada in 1931 now it’s time to free ourselves
The Canadian government is de facto [illegitimate] because the Statute of Westminster freed Canada from Britain in 1931, empowering Canadians to choose their type of preferred governance. Martial law was declared to ensure good governance and prevent insurgence until Canadians were in agreement except that Canadians were never informed. Instead the Canadian government established a representative democracy where they make the decisions instead of Canadians in a pure direct democracy.
Silent no more
It’s up to every Canadian to expand your awareness, stand together, and take lawful action to save ourselves and Canada.
Follow up to Statement of Claim T2068-18
Statement of Claim T2068-18 was thrown out of court in Canada, which is fine because lawful action will continue, to re-establish governance for the people by the people, and pull Canada from the brink of globalization. Read more at https://ourgreaterdestiny.org/2019/01/public-interest-constitutional-class-action-canada/
Doreen Ann Agostino [c]
Without Prejudice and Without Recourse