Brief To the House Of Commons COVI Committee Canada & World Bank COVI Life until Mar 25, 2005

May 9, 2020 By Vaccine Choice Canada

Dear Members of the COVI Committee,

The World Health Organization, our federal, provincial and municipal governments, chief medical officers, and mainstream media would have us believe that we are facing the biggest threat to humanity in our lifetime. Predictions of wide-spread infection with high rates of mortality persuaded governments that unprecedented containment measures were necessary to save us from certain peril.

While there is much about the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus that is yet to be understood, the emerging evidence clearly demonstrates that the mathematical modeling used to justify these extreme containment measures are invalid and the vast majority of the population are not at serious risk of complications or mortality as a result of exposure to SARS-CoV-2.

Further, the drastic isolation measures that have been introduced by our governments for an undetermined period of time are not supported by scientific evidence, nor do they have the consensus agreement of the scientific community. There is much severe and valid criticism from recognized experts who dispute the governments’ position and response to SARS-CoV-2. [i] [ii] [iii]

There are reasons for Canadians to be concerned that an over-hyped SARS-CoV-2 pandemic narrative is creating unnecessary panic. This panic is then being used to justify systemic governmental violations of the rights and freedoms that form the basis of our society, including our constitutional rights, sovereignty, privacy, rule of law, financial security, and even our very democracy.

Vaccine Choice Canada has sought a legal opinion on our government’s actions, and it is clear that significant violations of our rights and freedoms are being perpetrated by our governments, health authorities, and municipal, provincial and federal policing.

Basis for Concern:

  1. There is no scientific evidence to substantiate the effectiveness of 2 meter ‘physical distancing’ as an intervention to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission and infection.
  2. The imposition of mass and indiscriminate self-isolation measures prevents the development of natural immunity necessary to secure herd immunity. [iv]
  3. It is the opinion of experts that efforts to suppress the virus through self-isolation measures prolongs the outbreak and puts more lives at risk, damages our economy and the mental stability and health of the more vulnerable.[v]
  4. The reported number of deaths attributed to SARS-CoV-2 is unreliable given the inclusion of “presumptive” deaths, and the failure of the medical establishment to differentiate between individuals dying from COVID 19 and those with co-morbidities dying with COVID 19. [vi]
  5. This failure inflates the risk of mortality from SARS-CoV-2 and undermines confidence in any actions based on mortality statistics.
  6. The presentation of the mortality data, expressed as a percentage of deaths of tested and confirmed cases, is distorting the data and creating undue panic. This data fails to include a significant number of individuals who contracted the virus but were not tested nor confirmed and who recovered without medical intervention.
  7. The number of reported deaths attributed to SARS-CoV-2 is not out of “normal” range when compared to the annual mortality from influenza and pneumonia recorded through the last decade. [vii] [viii]
  8. There is no data to indicate that the total mortality in Canada has increased substantially from previous years.
  9. Mortality modeling by the World Health Organization, Imperial College of London, and the US Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation have all been drastically downgraded. Strategies based on these erroneous numbers are not valid.
  10. The Canadian government has not been transparent with its data and modeling.
  11. The Canadian government has not been transparent with its exit strategy.
  12. The suspensions of our rights to participate in community and in commerce is causing substantial and irreparable harm to our economy, livelihoods, communities, families, and the physical and psychological well-being of Canadians. There is no evidence that these harms are being considered in the modeling. [ix]
  13. SARS (2003), Swine Flu/H1N1 (2009), and MERS (2012) were all considered pandemics and were contained without lockddowns, economic ruin, violations of privacy, or the loss of personal freedoms.
  14. The number of SARS -CoV-2 deaths is significantly less than the number of deaths reported from each of these recent pandemics.
  15. The suspension of our civil liberties is not justified by the level of risk posed by SARS-CoV-2.
  16. The suspension of our right to liberty, to travel, and to conduct commerce is not justified by the level of risk posed by SARS-CoV-2.[x]
  17. The use of surveillance technologies to monitor citizens constitutes a clear violation of our right to privacy.
  18. The closure of our courts of law is unprecedented, illegal, unconstitutional, undemocratic, unnecessary, and impedes the ability of Canadians to hold our governments accountable.
  19. The closure of our parliaments is unprecedented, illegal, unconstitutional, undemocratic, unnecessary, and impedes the ability of Canadians to hold our governments accountable.
  20. As of this date, the Prime Minister of Canada has not invoked the Emergencies Act. Therefore, emergency measures announced by the Prime Minister and his public statements to Canadians to “just stay home” have no legal basis or authority, are an abuse of power, and is resulting in confusing, dangerous and unlawful messaging.

Evidence Required

The following questions need to be answered to ascertain whether the government’s response to SARS-CoV-2 is measured, reasonable, and supported by demonstrable evidence: Continued at

World Bank reveals COVID-19 project is planned until March 25.20

Covid Program 2025 1

Dr. Carrie Madej: COVID19 vaccine = GMO Humans

There is a battle raging for humanity. Dr. Carrie Madej reveals how Big Tech collaborates with Big Pharma to introduce new technologies in the coming vaccines, that will alter our DNA and turn us into hybrids. This will end humanity as we know it, and start the process of transhumanism: HUMAN 2.0.

The plans are to use vaccines to inject nanotechnology into our bodies and connect us to the Cloud and artificial intelligence. This will enable corrupt governments and tech giants to control us, without us being aware of it.

Parliamentary e-petition – NO AGE MINIMUM TO SIGN

Our species is threatened by COVID19 measures not demonstrably justified.

Depression, drug dependency, business closures, unemployment leading to forced government dependency, loss of property, privacy, dignity, and mandatory vaccines, including an experimental COVID19 vaccine that aims to patent the human genome so man can be transformed into a commodity that is bought, sold and traded are real.

Those who refuse the vaccine will be considered a health threat, denied the ability to buy or sell anything, and destined to confinement in internment camps.

Qui tacet consentire videtur. He who is silent appears to consent. Jenk. Cent. 32.

There is a lot at stake so please, sign and share this Parliamentary e-petition and re-post often to reach more and more people. Thank you.

Without Prejudice and Without Recourse
Doreen A Agostino
Via ethernet to safeguard life


About ourgreaterdestiny

Seniorpreneur, Author, Blogger, Radio Host, Editor, Researcher, Coherence and Freedom Resonator.
This entry was posted in Cognitive dissonance, Consciousness, DNA, Influenza coup, m-RNA jab, Media malfeasance, Purification, Voters and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Brief To the House Of Commons COVI Committee Canada & World Bank COVI Life until Mar 25, 2005

  1. Pingback: Brief To the House Of Commons COVI Committee Canada & World Bank COVI Life until Mar 25, 2005 – New Human New Earth Communities

Leave a Reply