Legal action taken against COVID19 measures

Last update Jan 11.21. Status of legal actions below.

Legal assistance available for nurses, doctors, health care providers, and others threatened with job loss if they tell the truth about medical tyranny.

Canada Health Alliance 

Dr. Stephen Malthouse [British Columbia] announced Canada Health Alliance, physicians, nurses and allied health professionals organizing actions geared to protect our medical freedoms and Charter rights

Dr. Malthouse’s letter to public health B.C.

Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms Calgary, Alberta

A central hub has been formed for doctors and nurses forced to remain silent about empty hospitals and no pandemic; health professionals staring tyranny in the face and threatened to be fired for speaking the truth.

Doctors and nurses acknowledge Public Health Orders and lockdowns are doing far greater harm than the virus ever will. To abide by the oath ‚ÄėFirst, do no harm‚Äô they are threatened with job loss. A nurse was told she will have to be vaccinated even if against her will. No one should be force vaccinated especially when the virus is less deadly than the annual flu 0.05% Infection Fatality Rate.

If you are, or know of, a doctor, nurse, Alberta Health Services employee, support staff, or contractor in need of legal support visit

Other Resources

Stand Up Canada offers legal documents to defend yourself, references if you require legal assistance, and some pro bono work.  

Constitutional lawyer Rocco Galati provides legal resources.

Other resource groups

Vaccine Choice Canada

Nurses from around the globe coming forward with the truth about covid.

World Doctor’s Alliance An independent non-profit alliance of doctors, nurses, healthcare professionals and staff united in the wake of the Covid-19 response, to end all lockdowns, related damaging measures, and to re-establish universal health determinance of psychological and physical well being for all humanity.


Thanks to Gisele

On January 2, 2021, Ecuador’s highest court ruled the new state of emergency decree of December 21 2020 unconstitutional. The Constitutional Court held that the reasons for the invocation of emergency powers – the allegation of increased “contagion” of Covid 19 and the future possibility of a new UK virus strain – were not sufficiently compelling to justify a one month state of emergency applying to the entire country.

The court ruled that narrower measures tailored toward protecting public health are available using non-emergency governmental procedures, and furthermore that a new state of emergency cannot be declared based upon future not current conditions nor can it be based on the same set of facts used to justify the earlier states of Covid-related emergency last year, the last of which expired in August.  Although called a state of “exception,” that is Ecuador’s particular language for a state of national disaster which gives the President extraordinary powers to curtail citizens’ constitutional rights including freedom of assembly and freedom of movement both of which had been restricted until yesterday’s ruling. The Court’s decision which was reported to have been signed six days ago, was not released until the evening of January 2. The front page article and text of the full decision is in the Ecuadorian newspaper of record El Comercio today, January 3, 2021.

The following link may or may not work but the newspaper’s website (below) should bring up this morning’s article or at least a follow up.  

General link:          

Austrian Court Overturns Mask Mandate in Schools

Dec 23.20

Austria’s Constitutional Court ruled Wednesday that two government measures to fight the spread of coronavirus in schools, compulsory mask-wearing and splitting classes into two halves to be taught in alternate shifts, were illegal.

The split classes system meant that some pupils had lessons on Mondays and Tuesdays and others on Wednesdays, Thursdays and Fridays.

At all other times they were to stay at home.

“In addition, it was decided that all persons present in school buildings, apart from during teaching time, had to wear a mask over their mouth and nose,” a statement from the court said.

“In it’s decision published today, the Constitutional Court ruled that the measures in question were illegal,” the statement went on.

It explained its decision by saying that the “ministry has not made clear why it considered these measures necessary”.

Two children and their parents had brought the case before the court, saying the measures violated the principles of equality before the law, the right to a private life and the right to education.

Since January Austria has been governed by a coalition of the Green party and the centre-right People’s Party (OeVP) of Chancellor Sebastian Kurz.

The education ministry, which is held by the OeVP, said in a statement that it had taken note of the court’s judgement and would examine the judges’ reasoning.

Constitutional Court of BiH decides Masks and Movement Restriction are Human Rights Violation

Thanks to Judy.

Dec 23.1o

At the session of the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina held yesterday online, a decision was made which says that the mandatory wearing of protective masks and the restriction of movement of BiH citizens that was adopted due to the coronavirus pandemic constitutes a violation of human rights.

As stated, the decisions of the crisis staff on the prohibition of movement and mandatory wearing of protective masks represent interference with the basic human rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution of BiH and the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

In the specific case, the crisis staff of the entity ministries of health made decisions, but there was no active participation in the adoption and review of the ordered measures by the highest bodies of legislative and executive power, the Constitutional Court explains.

Dec 07, 2020 Justice Centre takes Alberta to court to end lockdowns

OUTCOME: A foundational myth of Canada‚Äôs Covid protest movement has it that at some climatic point in this horror-show the judiciary will rush in to vanquish our medical tormentors. A recent ruling by Justice Kirker of Alberta‚Äôs Court of Queen‚Äôs Bench pours pails of ice-water onto this fever-born fantasy. According to Canada‚Äôs Constitution a government may limit any right or freedom provided it does so in a lawful manner consistent with democratic principles. Apparently, a Health Ministry press release suffices to discharge such obligations. An appeal all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada will take years. 

Nov 2020 Portugal

Nov 2020 Denmark.


Jan 11, 2021 ‘Police On Guard For Thee’ retained Constitutional lawyer Rocco Galati regarding covid measures in Canada.

Dec 09, 2020 Justice Centre files legal action against Manitoba lockdowns

Nov 25, 2020 Reiner Fuellmich in Germany, a Corona Investigative Committee lawyer, filed a Crimes Against Humanity Defamation lawsuit in Germany.

Aug 17, 2020 Nicole Lebrasseur declared Canada’s independence from the United Kingdom.

July 06, 2020 Rocco Galati, Constitutional lawyer, Toronto, Ontario on behalf of filed a lawsuit forcing defendants, the Government of Canada, the Government of Ontario, the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, various public health officials, and the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, to defend COVID19 measures in Canada.

June 09, 2020 Nicole Lebrasseur filed a lawsuit of malfeasance against the government of Canada. Included in the lawsuit, and attached as an Appendix using COVID19 measures as proof of malfeasance, a formal letter declared Canada’s independence from the United Kingdom.

Lawsuits are not enough. A world coup that is advancing requires individuals to take a stand for truth and freedom en masse if we are to avert the great ‘upset’.  

Covid measures are illegal

It’s up to each of us to inform others including elected representatives, public health officers, and law enforcement officers who are duty bound to safeguard our fundamental rights and freedom. Thank you.

Without Prejudice and Without Recourse
Doreen A Agostino
Via ethernet to safeguard life


About ourgreaterdestiny

Author, Radio Host, Researcher, Editor, and synthesizer of facts, for people to rescue themselves from unawareness, fear, and limitations.
This entry was posted in Awakening humans, Consciousness, Great purification, Law, Media malfeasance, Not demonstrably justified, VAXX, Voters and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Legal action taken against COVID19 measures

  1. Pingback: Lockdowns + restrictions ruled unconstitutional: WHERE ARE THE OTHER LAWYERS? |

Leave a Reply