The truth is revealed to purify the past and make way for a new era. Unprecedented censorship is a ‘signal’ to pass the truth along.
House of Numbers | Anatomy of an Epidemic HIV/AIDS
Is AIDS U.S. $90B Taxpayer Dollars a Global Slush Fund?
https://www.coreysdigs.com/health-science/is-aids-us-90b-taxpayer-dollars-a-global-slush-fund/ [2 min video; colossal fraud then as now]
SV40 [Simian Virus] was discovered in 1960, and soon after found in the polio vaccine. CDC_Polio.png (1126×1873) (preventdisease.com)
Dr. Maurice Hillman, Developer of Merck’s vaccine program, when he spoke about bringing monkeys over from Africa that were used to manufacture the polio vaccine had this to say, “I brought African greens in. I didn’t know we were importing AIDS* virus at the time.” https://www.naturalblaze.com/2019/03/if-truth-be-told-about-the-sv-40-cancer-virus-in-the-original-polio-vaccines-given-to-millions-of-american-children.html?utm_source=Natural+Blaze+Subscribers&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=a8d41039ae-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_term=0_b73c66b129-a8d41039ae-388229733
The HIV/AIDS story was rewritten through uncensored points of view by all major players — in their own settings, in their own words. It rocks the foundation upon which all conventional wisdom regarding HIV/AIDS is based. If, as South African health advocate Pephsile Maseko remarks, “This is the beginning of a war…a war to reclaim our health,” then House of Numbers could well be the opening salvo in the battle to bring sanity and clarity to an epidemic clearly gone awry.
Full documentary http://houseofnumbers.com
The story of AZT, one of the most toxic, expensive, and controversial drugs in the history of medicine
SINS OF OMISSION – Excerpts
*HIV was never isolated to prove it causes an infectious disease called Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes [AIDS], and yet after decades, money suddenly became available to find a cure for AIDS, which became the most covered news story in history causing people to go from neglect to fear and panic.
The FDA asked 11 top AIDS doctors to consider ‘lightning-quick approval’ for a highly toxic drug, a form of chemotherapy about which there was little information. Clinically called Zidovudine, nicknamed AZT after its components, Burroughs Wellcome’s drug was said to have shown a dramatic effect on the survival of AIDS patients. At the meeting, there was a lot of uncertainty and discomfort with AZT.
Doctors who had been consulted knew the study was flawed and the long-range effects were completely unknown. To approve it, said Ellen Cooper, an FDA director, would represent a “significant and potentially dangerous departure from our normal toxicology requirements.” Without adequate data nor follow up, which several members of the panel felt uncomfortable with and feared could be a time bomb, AZT was approved.
At a price of $8.000 per patient per year (not including blood-work and transfusions), AZT was the most expensive drug ever marketed. “Undeniably, AZT kills T-4 cells [white blood cells vital to the immune system],” says molecular biologist Dr. Harvey Bialy. “No one can argue with that. AZT is a chain-terminating nucleotide, which means that it stops DNA replication. It seeks out any cell that is engaged in DNA replication and kills it. The place where most of this replication is taking place is in the bone marrow. That’s why the most common and severe side effect of the drug is bone marrow toxicity. That is why they [patients] need blood transfusions.”
AZT was the only antiretroviral drug that had received FDA approval for treatment of AIDS since the epidemic began ten years ago, and the decision to approve it was based on a single study that has long been declared invalid. Skepticism and challenge, so essential to scientific progress and so prevalent in every other area of scientific endeavor, are not welcome in the AZT debate, where it is arguably needed more than anywhere else.
Aug 17, 1987
Newspapers across America banner-headlined that AZT had been “proven to be effective in HIV antibody-positive, asymptomatic, and early ARC patients,” even though one of the panel’s main concerns was that the drug should only be used in a last-case scenario for critically-ill AIDS patients, due to the drug’s extreme toxicity. Dr. Anthony Fauci, head of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), pushed to expand prescription.
Aug 17, 1989
Dr. Fauci, proudly announced that a trial has been going on for “two years” had “clearly shown” that early intervention will keep AIDS at bay. Anyone who has antibodies to HIV and less than 500 T-4 cells should start taking AZT at once, he said. That is approximately 650,000 people. 1.4 million Americans are assumed HIV antibody-positive, and eventually all of them may need to take AZT so they don’t get sick, Fauci contended. The leading newspapers didn’t seem to think it unusual that there was no existing copy of the study, but rather a breezy two-page press release from the NIH. When SPIN called the NIH asking for a copy of the study, we were told that it was “still being written.”
It has also been proposed that AZT be given to people who do not yet even test positive for HIV antibodies, but are at risk.
“This is such shoddy science it’s hard to believe nobody is protesting.”
The Lancet published a study that Burroughs Wellcome and the NIH excluded from their press kits. More expansive than the original AZT study, it followed patients longer, was conducted in France at the Claude Bernard Hospital in Paris, and concluded the same things about AZT that Burroughs Wellcome’s study did, except Burroughs Wellcome called their results “overwhelmingly positive,” and the French doctors called theirs “disappointing.” The French study found, once again, that AZT was too toxic for most to tolerate, had no lasting effect on HIV blood levels, and left patients with fewer T-4 cells than they started with. Although they noticed a clinical improvement at first, they concluded that “by six months, these values had returned to their pre-treatment levels, and several opportunistic infections, malignancies, and deaths occurred. https://www.spin.com/featured/aids-and-the-azt-scandal-spin-1989-feature-sins-of-omission/
Dr. Len Horowitz presents his case that AIDS is a biological weapon man-made in a laboratory. https://youtu.be/OvgIghMvk6M
HIV/AIDS Timeline https://npin.cdc.gov/pages/hiv-and-aids-timeline
Dr. Stefan Lanka Explains the HIV LIE https://youtu.be/kG_r00Z9OBg
Please share, for people to see the dire consequences of apathy, denial, and ignoring evidence. Thank you.
Without Prejudice and Without Recourse
Doreen A Agostino
Via ethernet to safeguard life